Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00849
Original file (PD2013 00849.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx              CASE: PD13-00849        
BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY           BOARD DATE: 20131115
SEPARATION DATE: 20060930                                  


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (25U, Signal Support) medically separated for low back pain, without neurologic deficit. The CI developed low back pain (LBP) during deployment to Iraq. Halfway through his tour, the back pain was so debilitating that he was removed from normal duties and assigned to the tactical operations center. Upon return to home base in Germany, he was treated with conservative treatment measures. However, the LBP condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent profile and underwent a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB forwarded his LBP condition to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The PEB found the LBP condition unfitting, and rated it 0% with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The CI made no appeals at that time, and was medically separated with a 0% disability rating.


CI CONTENTION: “I believe the rating is inaccurate because my disability has rendered me from being able to work. My disability is service connected. Injury and disability service connected from combat during OIF II in 2004. I was deemed unfit to return to combat with my next unit because I was on permanent profile because of my medical conditions. My injuries are from combat related situations. Please review.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The Service rating for the unfitting low back pain is addressed below. No other conditions are within the Board’s defined purview. Any conditions outside the Board’s scope of review may be eligible for consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (BCMR).


RATING COMPARISON :

Army PEB – dated 20060809
 VA – (Exam was ~ 5 mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Low Back Pain, without Neurologic Deficit 5237 0% Myofascial Pain Syndrome, of the Lower Back 5299-5237 20% 20070308
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x 4 20070308
Combined: 0%
 Combined: 70%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 70517 (most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] )


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the sentiment expressed by the CI regarding the impairment with which his LBP condition continues to burden him, and the significant impact it has had on his quality of life. It is noted for the record that the Board is subject to the same laws for Service disability entitlements as those under which the military Disability Evaluation System (DES) operates. The DES has neither the role nor the authority to compensate service members for future severity or potential complications of conditions. That role and authority is granted to the Veterans’ Administration (VA). The Board also acknowledges the CI’s assertion that his condition should have been considered combat related. The Board has neither the jurisdiction nor authority to scrutinize or render opinions in regard to this matter. The Board’s role is confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of DES fitness and rating determinations, based on severity at separation.

Low Back Pain (LBP). In 2004, the CI had onset of LBP while deployed to Iraq. He was removed from his normal duty position, and placed on light duty in the Tactical Operations Center. When his unit returned to home base in Germany, the CI began receiving physical therapy (PT). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in December 2005 was normal. The LBP was primarily in the left lower back, and did not radiate to the lower extremities. The pain was aggravated by bending, lifting, and prolonged sitting or standing. In spite of PT, steroid injections, and other forms of treatment, the LBP persisted and an MEB was initiated. The MEB physical examination (PE) was in July 2006 at Darnall Army Medical Center (DAMC), Fort Hood. On PE of the lower back, there was no erythema (redness), warmth, tenderness, or palpable mass. The spine appeared to be grossly aligned. Forward flexion was limited by pain. Gait was normal. Heel walk, toe walk, and heel-to-toe walk were all normal. Neurological exam showed normal sensation, normal reflexes, and normal motor strength. There was no gross muscle atrophy of any major muscle groups. Thoracolumbar range of motion (ROM) was measured by PT, and is summarized in the chart below.

As noted above, the CI was medically separated from service on 30 September 2006. Five months later, in March 2007, he had a VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam. At that time, the CI reported that he had not seen a doctor since leaving the Army. He denied any deficits in activities of daily living (ADLs). He was using Naprosyn and Aleve “as needed” for pain. On PE, posture was normal but his gait was mildly antalgic. The CI was constantly trying to pop his back, saying it was very uncomfortable and would feel better if he could pop it. There was some tenderness of the back, and moderate muscle spasm. Straight leg raise (SLR) was difficult to test, due to pain in the knees and back. X-ray of the lumbosacral spine showed slight deviation and curvature, most likely due to muscle spasm. The ROM evaluations which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, are summarized below.

Thoracolumbar ROM
(Degrees)
 MEB (PT) ~ 2 ½ mos . Pre-Sep
(20060706)
 VA C&P ~ 5 mos . Post-Sep
(20070308)
Flexion (90 Normal)
 25 50
Combined (240)
 110 125
Comment
 (inconsistencies noted ) (painful motion)

The Board carefully reviewed all of the evidentiary information available, and directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The Army PEB and the VA chose different coding and rating options for the LBP condition. The PEB coded it 5237 (lumbosacral strain) and rated it 0%. The VA used code 5299-5237 (analogous to lumbosacral strain) and assigned a disability rating of 20%. Thoracolumbar forward flexion was limited to 25 degrees at the June 2006 PT exam. The Board determined that there were inconsistencies in that ROM evaluation, which cast some doubt on its validity and probative value. Forward flexion limited to 25 degrees would almost certainly preclude certain activities of daily living (ADLs) such as sitting in a chair, riding in a car, or getting dressed. The record does not indicate that the CI was unable to sit in a chair, ride in a car, or dress himself. In fact, the record indicates that the CI gave subjective information while sitting in a chair. The Board determined that the inconsistencies in the June 2006 PT exam caused diminution in the validity and probative value of that PE. Therefore, the Board assigned greater probative value to the March 2007 C&P exam. At that PE, forward flexion was 50 degrees, and combined thoracolumbar ROM was 125 degrees. IAW the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) §4.71a, a 20% rating is warranted when forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine is greater than 30 degrees but not greater than 60 degrees.

After due deliberation, the Board determined that a rating of 20% was warranted. Considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20% for the LBP condition. It is appropriately coded 5299-5237 (analogous to lumbosacral strain), and IAW VASRD §4.71a, meets criteria for the 20% rating level based on forward flexion greater than 30 degrees but not greater than 60 degrees.  


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy may have been operant in this case and the CI’s back condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board. In the matter of the LBP condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, IAW VASRD §4.71a.

There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic low back pain, without neurologic deficit 5299-5237 20%
COMBINED
 20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130613, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record



                          
                 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, DAF
                  President
                  Physical Disability Board of Review


SFMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, AR20140003450 (PD201300849)


1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary
                                                      (Army Review Boards)





Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02651

    Original file (PD-2013-02651.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic thoracolumbar back pain due to scoliosis” as unfitting, rated 20%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. RECOMMENDATION : The Board,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01159

    Original file (PD-2014-01159.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20060206VA – (1 week Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Low Back Pain…523710%Discogenic Disease and Spinal Stenosis…524320%20060228Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 3 Combined: 10%Combined: 40% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20060321 (most proximate to date of separation (DOS)) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :The Board acknowledges the CI’s contention that a higher rating should have been granted for the unfitting medical...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00618

    Original file (PD2012 00618.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The low back condition, characterized as “spondylolisthesis (grade I),” “bilateral lower extremity radiculopathy (S1) and “degenerative disc disease L5-S1,”was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) In accordance with (IAW)AR 40-501.The MEB forwarded no other conditions to the PEB.The PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain with injury”as unfitting rated at0%. In the matter of the LBP condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00863

    Original file (PD2013 00863.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated chronic back pain as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy.The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting.The CI made no appealsand was medically separated. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01774

    Original file (PD-2013-01774.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation)*ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Back Pain, without Neurological Abnormality5299-523710%Diffuse Lumbar Spondylosis5003-524210%20050104Left L5-S1 Radiculopathy 8599-852010%20050104Other x 0Other x 3 Rating: 10%Combined: 20%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050323 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) Low Back Pain (LBP) . A 10% rating is also warranted when combined thoracolumbar ROM is greater than 120 degrees but not greater than 235...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00793

    Original file (PD2013 00793.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I request the review board consider: 1) the appropriate application of the VASRD rating for VA code 5237 based on the forward flexion of thoracolumbar spine documented in the NARSUM, 2) the rating of radicular pain as contributing to the unfitting condition in accordance with AR 635-40, Section 4-19f (6) (b), and 3) review all conditions identified but determined not to be unfitting by the PEB (see page 7 of NARSUM).” There is no evidence of a separately ratable functional impairment (with...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02120

    Original file (PD-2014-02120.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    “Lumbago”was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.AnInformal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated chronic low back pain(LBP) without neurologic abnormality as unfitting, rated 0%. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. RECOMMENDATION : The...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01983

    Original file (PD-2013-01983.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Back Pain523710%Degenerative Disc Disease 5242-524320%20051123Other MEB/PEB Conditions x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 8 RATING: 10%RATING: 70% *Derived from...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01068

    Original file (PD2013 01068.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the evidence, the Board determined that a disability rating of 10% was appropriate. On MSE, the CI’s orientation, appearance, hygiene, behavior and eye contact were all normal. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01911

    Original file (PD-2013-01911.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA rated under a peripheral nerve code 8520 (sciatic nerve) at 40% (moderately severe) citing pain and numbness to both extremities; in addition to lumbar disc protrusion for 10% under code 5242 (degenerative arthritis).Board members first agreed that sufficient evidence of painful motion was present to justify the rating of 10%, as well as the presence of localized tenderness not resulting in abnormal gait or spinal contour IAW §4.59 and §4.71a.Next, members acknowledged the ROM values...